Home
  Subscribe to eNewsletter
  Online
  Breaking News
  Blogs
  Web Exclusives
  eNewsletter Archives
  Video
  Webinars
  Current
  Features
  Column
  Industry News
  Codes
  Details
  Products
  Architect Profile
  Architect of the Month Application Form (PDF)
  Resources
  Market Research
  List Rental
  ARW Info
  Archives
  Contact Us
  Specs
  Digital Edition
  Archived Digital Editions
  ED+C Digital Edition
  Media Kit
  Related Publications
  ED+C
  Roofing Contractor
Search in: EditorialProductsCompanies
Gulf Coast Oil Leak: Environmental Catastrophe vs. U.S. Independence
by Tim Fausch
May 28, 2010

ARTICLE TOOLS
EmailEmailPrintPrintReprintsReprintsshareShare

/Oil Slick.JPG
Photo Credit: Eric Gay, AP from MSNBC.


I’m an ardent fan of the great outdoors. I run and bike on nature trails. I’m the family recycling nut. My favorite vacation destinations are Zion National Park, The Grand Canyon, Glacier National Park, and Bryce Canyon. I love lakes, rivers and the ocean.

Career wise, my first job with BNP Media was as an editor on Solar Engineering & Contractingmagazine.  I am a big fan of our two all green brands, Environmental Design + Construction and Sustainable Facility.

So you can appreciate why I was distressed to learn via MSNBC that the oil spill in the Gulf Coast is bigger than the slick caused by the Exxon Valdez (www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37353392/ns/gulf_oil_spill/?GT1=43001) and is now the worst in U.S. history.

At first, media coverage focused on the fiery accident and tragic death of the oil workers. Soon after, coverage shifted to the ongoing environmental impact, accusations of poor emergency response, and who is to blame. Federal support of offshore drilling has turned into efforts to curtail offshore drilling.

I certainly understand why environmentalists are outraged. No one wants to see such damage, some of which might take decades to reverse. Fisherman, shrimpers, and resorts are being severely impacted.

Clearly, this oil spill is a mega disaster.

And yet, I am hoping that our righteous anger doesn’t cause elected officials to make emotional or political decisions that could hurt the U.S. in other ways. Banning offshore drilling would lead to greater dependence on foreign sources and higher prices for gas and oil products, thus increasing the cost of doing business in the U.S.

A good first step is to take an analytical approach to this mess. So I was encouraged when I read this oil leak analysis (www.economist.com/science-technology/displaystory.cfm?story_id=16160853&source=features_box_main) published by The Economist and the steps BP Oil is taking to fix it. It was good to see coverage that focused on cause-and-effect, rather than name-calling and finger-pointing.

I know what some of you are thinking. Why not simply ramp up our energy conservation efforts and develop alternative energy sources so we can be done with off shore drilling?

This approach was popular in the early 1980s when the Carter administration set a goal of generating 20% of the country’s energy through renewable sources. Unfortunately, the conversation rates of those sources were not cost-competitive then, and as far as I can tell, most are not competitive on a major scale today. I wish they were.

This blog reaches engineers, designers, manufacturers, architects, consultants, contractors and many other pros who are all smarter and more technically savvy than me. I would love to hear your reactions to the oil spill and how we should move forward.

Post your comments to this blog or email me at fauscht@bnpmedia.


Tim Fausch
fauscht@bnpmedia.com
Tim Fausch is publishing director of BNP Media’s Architecture, Engineering & Construction, Security and Mechanical Systems Groups, a collection of more than 20 trade magazines, Web sites and e-newsletters.  Just don't ask him to use any actual tools. Email Tim at fauscht@bnpmedia.com.


|PrintEmail
  Comments (2)Post a Comment
Title: conservation


Tim,
Energy conservation was one of the President Carters programs back in the 80's, the other was the 40% renewable energy tax credit which I think was a huge waste of tax dollars. Of course a lot was learned about the limitations of renewables back then, I'm guessing that is the point your making. Hopefully some of those leasons won't have to be re-learned by a new generation of ambitious entrepreneurs getting into solar and other alternatives.

Energy conservation doesn't mean spending a lot of money in many instances. Using what we have more wisely, and making homes & business more energy efficient can be as simple as adding some insulation and sealing cracks.


Title: Oil Spill Gulf Of Mexico 2010


Planetresource.net has a Eco friendly solution to clean up the tragedy British Petroleum has created, please watch the video animation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60bdQQQ3iVw and pass this along to as many people as you know.

One person can still make a difference in this world, is that simple interactions have a rippling effect. Each time this gets pass along, the hope in cleaning our planet is passed on.


 

No HTML or BBCode in comments please.
 


Did you enjoy this article? Click here to subscribe to the magazine.



Platinum:
Gold:

Silver:

Bronze:



E-Newsletter

Click here to subscribe to our free newsletter.


Subscribe For Free

Interested in FREE MAGAZINES? Start your subscription to any BNP publication by clicking here.
Subscribe










© 2010 BNP Media. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy